Falsification Strategy

by Johanne GT Joan
Falsification Strategy

The chapters of the authentic Gospels were fragmented by the forger and distributed among different evangelists in the New Testament, in a completely different context. Entire passages were removed from the authentic chapters and only fragments were published and packaged in such a way as to give them a completely different meaning.

Since the motive was carefully concealed, the forger managed to fudge the authentic texts in such a way that if the original and the forgery were compared, no difference in meaning would be apparent.

The forger's methods, modus operandi and intentions

The motive was quickly recognisable: the forger used key words taken from the authentic Gospel and then inserted them into the New Testament with a different meaning - usually in fantasy stories - in pursuit of a specific aim and objective. 

Symbolism was transformed into real-life scenarios and vice versa. In this way, the forger was able to proclaim the opposite with the same words, while still being consistent with the Old Testament. 

The simple negation of a sentence was a common way of falsifying. But even by swapping a tiny word, such as a preposition, the meaning of a sentence could be completely different.
The similarity of terms was clearly intended to trigger a kind of 'déjà vu' in readers, but also - and I didn't realise this until later - to provide a basis for the absurd teaching of grace: Followers were softened by fantasy. They had to stop using their intelligence. The virtue par excellence was to believe the unbelievable in order to prove one's faith. After all, a sceptic does not inherit eternal life. And since faith cannot be measured, everyone claimed to be saved on the basis of their faith. 

On the basis of the fantasy served up to us by the Bible, it was not difficult for the falsifier to make credible a religion of grace that is as insane as claiming that Jesus resuscitated corpses that were already decomposing, that he defied the storm or that he walked on water.

"It gradually became apparent that the whole of the NT, without exception, had been written, or even falsified, according to the same principle"

The followers of the religion of grace thought they belonged to a religion that was not a religion at all, since it simply consisted of believing that Jesus had died for their own sin. They were taught that they were fundamentally evil and incapable of respecting God's commandments. That's why Jesus died on the cross.

The process of falsification allowed no other conclusion than that the NT and important parts of the OT came from one and the same source, but also that all the NT writings had been written at the same time and that the authentic gospels used for this purpose had to be united at some point.
Share by: